CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD | |||||||||||
| Order Sheet | |||||||||||
|
Item No: 3 O.A./176/2017 [ PROMOTION ] Court No.: 1 |
No of Adjournment:
18 Dated: 10/06/2019 | ||||||||||
|
NITIN KUMAR SHARMA Vs CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE & CUSTOM | |||||||||||
| JOY MATHEW | |||||||||||
| R.R.Patel R-1 to 3 | |||||||||||
DAILY ORDER | |||||||||||
10.6.2019 Present : Shri Joy Mathew counsel for applicant Ms. R.R.Patel counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 None for respondent No.4 & 5 Record reveals that respondent No.5 could not be served earlier, so on last date fresh notice was directed to be issued to respondent No.5. Notice was issued and Dasti service was allowed. Affidavit of applicant has been filed that notice has been served upon respondent No.5 on 08.5.2019. As noted above, neither respondent No.4 nor respondent No.5 has appeared, in larger interest, one more opportunity is granted to enable the respondents who have since not appeared to file their reply if they desires. Registry is also directed to supply detail report regarding service of notice upon respondent No.4. Put up on 09.8.2019.
|
|||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| M. C. Verma Member (J) |
|||||||||||