CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH | |||||||||||
| Order Sheet | |||||||||||
|
Item No: 24 O.A./1067/2015 [ RECOVERY ] Court No.: 1 |
No of Adjournment:
2 Dated: 31/03/2017 | ||||||||||
|
RAMESH KUMAR Vs UT OF CHANDIGARH | |||||||||||
| Mr. Gagandeep, proxy for Mr. Rajesh Arora, Advocate. | |||||||||||
| Mr. K.K. Thakur, proxy for Mr. Arvind Moudgil, Advocate. | |||||||||||
DAILY ORDER | |||||||||||
Learned arguing counsel for the parties are stated to be unable to argue the case today, as the CAT Bar Association, has resolved to abstain from work, in the wake of call given by the BAR Council of India, regarding contemplated amendment in the Advocates Act. Therefore, the case is adjourned to 24.04.2017 for arguments, at the joint request of learned proxy counsel for the parties.
|
|||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| Uday Kumar Varma Member (A) | Justice M. S. Sullar Member (J) |
||||||||||