CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH | |||||||||||
| Order Sheet | |||||||||||
|
Item No: 13 M.A./432/2017 IN O.A./321/2017 [ ] Court No.: 2 |
No of Adjournment:
6 Dated: 13/03/2018 | ||||||||||
|
RANDHIR SINGH Vs M/O DEFENCE | |||||||||||
| Mr. Tej Pal Singh, Advocate proxy for Mr. Balraj Singh Dhull, Advocate | |||||||||||
| Mr. B.B. Sharma, Advocate | |||||||||||
DAILY ORDER | |||||||||||
M.A./60/432/2017 Heard the learned counsel for the parties on the application for condonation of delay. The learned counsel for applicant submits that being a recurring cause of action the delay in filing the accompanying O.A. be condoned as the applicant is getting lesser pay every month than the private respondent no. 5 Ram Naresh. The learned counsel representing the respondents is not in a position to rebut the arguments made by the learned counsel for applicant. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for applicant and going through the averments made in the M.A., the same is allowed. The delay in filing the O.A. is condoned. Original Application Mr. B.B. Sharma,learned counsel for respondents seeks and is allowed 4 weeks time to file reply to O.A. List on 17.4.2018. |
|||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| P. Gopinath Member (A) | Sanjeev Kaushik Member (J) |
||||||||||