CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH

Order Sheet
Item No: 13
M.A./432/2017
IN
O.A./321/2017
[ ]
Court No.: 2
No of Adjournment: 6
Dated: 13/03/2018

RANDHIR SINGH
Vs
M/O DEFENCE

FOR APPLICANTS(S) Advocate :
Mr. Tej Pal Singh, Advocate proxy for Mr. Balraj Singh Dhull, Advocate

FOR RESPONDENT(S) Advocate :
Mr. B.B. Sharma, Advocate


DAILY ORDER

M.A./60/432/2017

Heard the learned counsel for the parties on the application for condonation of delay.

The learned counsel for applicant submits that being a recurring cause of action the delay in filing the accompanying O.A. be condoned as the applicant is getting lesser pay every month than the private respondent no. 5 Ram Naresh.

The learned counsel representing the respondents is not in a position to rebut the arguments made by the learned counsel for applicant.

Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for applicant and going through the averments made in the M.A., the same is allowed. The delay in filing the O.A. is condoned.

Original Application

Mr. B.B. Sharma,learned counsel for respondents seeks and is allowed 4 weeks time to file reply to O.A.

List on 17.4.2018.







P. Gopinath
Member (A)
Sanjeev Kaushik
Member (J)